Tuesday, February 24, 2009

from Pro-Life Action Ministries

Here is a note from our friends at Pro-Life Action Ministries regarding the 40 Days for Life campaign beginning Wednesday, Feb. 25.


Just a reminder that our opening prayer vigil for the 40 Days for Life Twin Cities Campaign is tomorrow, February 25 at 7:00 pm. in front of HealthPartners' Regions Hospital, 640 Jackson Street, St. Paul, Minn.

The time to begin to go peacefully and preyerfully as a clear and unequivocal witness for the lives of the unborn is now! All our efforts, no matter how inspiring and good, no matter how large the response, will fail if we are unwilling to put a face to our witness and feet to our words! Beginning tomorrow evening, you are needed to keep vigil, to pray, to fast, to publically witness for the unborn at risk of being killed by abortion. For the next 40 days and nights, we will keep this vigil, calling on all good Christians to join with us in this important effort. Be with us for this opening prayer, take an hour or more, join in prayer and fasting, be a part of stopping abortion!

Sincerely in Christ,

Brian Gibson
Executive Director
Pro-Life Action Ministries


"If you remain indifferent in time of adversity, your strength will depart from you. Rescue those who are being dragged to death, and from those tottering to execution withdraw not. If you say, 'I know not this man!', does not He who tests hearts perceive it? He who guards your life knows it, and He will repay each one according to his deeds." Proverbs 24:10-12

Announcement: Sidewalk Counseling Seminar

If you can hand someone a brochure, you can save a life! Learn how to save babies, help families, and convert abortion workers by peacefully offering pro-life brochures and speaking the truth in Christ's love to those entering abortion centers. Every week in the Twin Cities area, nearly 270 unborn babies are scheduled to be killed. More sidewalk counselors and prayer supporters are greatly needed.

Free seminar
Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 7:00-9:00 p.m.
University of St. Thomas, John Roach Center, Room 126 (JRC Auditorium)
(By the arches near Summit and S. Cleveland Aves.)

Sponsored by the UST Students for Human Life and presented by Pro-Life Action Ministries. Call (651) 771-1500 or e-mail prolife@plam.org for more information.

Time Magazine’s False Report on FOCA

Great article on FOCA from The Weekly Standard Blog via Alliance Alert:

John McCormack writes at the Weekly Standard Blog:

Ramesh Ponnuru takes apart a shoddy report on the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) by Time magazine’s Amy Sullivan . . .

Worst of all, Sullivan writes that it is a “false claim” that FOCA would “lead to at least 100,000 more abortions each year.”

Read the rest of the story here.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Fundraiser for Acacia Fund--week of Feb. 23rd

The Acacia Fund is MWC's client assistance fund.

Dr. Jeff Brist of Brist Chiropractic & Naturopathic Wellness Center is offering free health exams for new patients who bring a donation for Metro Women's Center the week of February 23.

For a cash donation, new patients can choose to receive either a chiropractic examination and x-rays (up to a $200 value) or a nutrition check-up Health Scan (up to a $160 value).

You may call Brist Chiropractic at 763-546-9151 for more information or to schedule an appointment.

Dr. Brist was one of the original supporters of Metro Women's Center and supports the Center each year in this way.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Arkansas House OKs Partial-Birth Abortion Ban, Gov. Mike Beebe Will Sign It

LifeNews: “The Arkansas state house approved legislation today that would ban partial-birth abortions. The vote comes one day after a contentious committee hearing where abortion advocates cursed, attacked legislators, and accused pro-life groups of not wanting to reduce abortions . . . “

Read the rest of the story here.

NOTE: IT IS INTERESTING TO ME THAT THE PRO-CHOICE FOLKS, WHEN FRUSTRATED, CURSE AND ATTACK. AS PRO-LIFERS, WHEN WE BECOME FRUSTRATED AT THE LACK OF RESPONSE TO OUR PLEAS FOR MERCY FOR THE UNBORN, LET'S NOT RESORT TO SUCH TACTICS. LET'S PRAY MORE AND LOVE MORE. WE CAN OUT-LOVE THE ENEMY THAT IS ABORTION!

Gonzales v. Carhart: A New Paradigm for Abortion Legislation

Christopher Mirakian, 77 UMKC L. Rev. 197 (2008)

(An excerpt is below. To view the full text, please use Westlaw, Lexis, a law library, or alternative source.)

The most recent chapter in the history of the abortion debate was written on April 18, 2007, when the Supreme Court decided Gonzales v. Carhart (“Carhart II”). The Court decided the issue of whether the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 was facially invalid in light of the Constitution and previous Supreme Court precedent. In reaching its ultimate conclusion that the Act was in fact constitutional, the Court employed a rationale that will guide legislators in their quest to more readily and freely introduce legislation regulating abortion at both the state and federal levels. While Carhart II resolves many issues, its main import is likely to be its erosion of constitutional resistance to abortion regulation in the United States. While the future of regulation in the area of abortion jurisprudence remains uncertain, bright guideposts have been erected, and legislatures nationwide are preparing for what will undoubtedly be a new era of abortion regulation in the United States.

To better understand and appreciate the current state of the legal landscape surrounding abortion, one must understand the origins of the debate, the transitions of the debate, and the Supreme Court precedents that have provided parameters within which the debate has taken place. Consequently, this Comment will begin by guiding the reader through a brief history of the ancient origins of the abortion conundrum. Transitioning from the ancient history to the modern era, in Part II, the Comment will analyze the most influential and noteworthy Supreme Court cases in the area of abortion regulation. After addressing pertinent Supreme Court precedent, Part III will analyze Carhart II, and contemplate its implications for future abortion regulation. Finally, in Parts IV and V, this Comment will attempt to give the reader a better understanding of what the future landscape of abortion regulation legislation may look like by offering an idea of what types of legislation may or may not pass constitutional muster. Ultimately, however, the goal of this Comment is to better illustrate the current state of abortion regulation in the United States and how the state of the law may transform over the course of the next generation.

NOTE: A LIFE IS A LIFE IS A LIFE, NO MATTER THE LOCATION. LET'S KEEP WORKING TO SAVE BABIES AND HELP MOTHERS ONE AT A TIME UNTIL THE LORD TAKES US HOME.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Out of the Mouths of Babes

The following story was written by a 9 year old girl named Alisa. She was given an assignment for school to write about what her "dream" would be in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. She gave me permission to use her story and her name. Her mom had Alisa when she was 19, and, as often happens, Alisa's mom was discarded by her boyfriend shortly after she let it be known that she was going to have her baby. Alisa does not know her dad but always tells everyone she is from a big family because all of her extended family loves her dearly. She is a very special joy and blessing to her family. Her grandma says that Alisa is a gift from God, not a punishment.

Alisa had been with her grandmother at the State Capitol on January 22 and heard the stories of the men and women who shared about having had abortions. This was her clarion call for us to stop abortions. I think we should listen to her.


We Should Stop Abortion

We should all stop abortion. It’s a horrible thing to do. That’s why I have a dream that one day this horrible thing called abortion will stop. I want abortion to stop because it’s like a nightmare to many people, except you don’t wake up from it. When moms abort their child, the doctors don’t mention that there’s other things to do than abortion. Our taxes help pay for abortion but shouldn’t someone finally stand up and say no!? It’s a horrible thing they do to the babies. To think the babies were safe in their own mom’s womb. The little babies didn’t do anything to us, so why should we do anything to them? What the doctors do to them is they use chemicals to burn the innocent babies to death. The doctor never tells them this either--that this might be your only baby in your entire life and you’ll never have one again. The doctors don’t know that the baby has a precious soul. They can’t see it with anything. Everyone deserves a life. That’s why I have a dream that abortion will be a law that no one can abort their child.

by Alisa, 4th grade,Cedar Creek Community School

Monday, February 16, 2009

Another God Thing

The weekend went great! God is always at work. I have a current client who called me over the weekend to say that she is living in a bad situation. She asked me to find her a different place to live. She and I prayed that we would be able to, and when I came in this morning, there was an e-mail from a new family inquiring about being a shepherding family. I love it when God meets a need before we know we need it!

WOW!

Matthew 6:7-13 NKJV

When you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do. For they think that they will be heard for their many words. Therefore do not be like them. For your Father knows the things you have need of before you ask Him. In this manner, therefore, pray:

Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name.
Your kingdom come.
Your will be done
On earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our debts,
As we forgive our debtors.
And do not lead us into temptation,
But deliver us from the evil one.
For Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.


Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Twisted Thinking about a "Blob of Invisible Tissue"

Lately I seem to be having more conversations with people about the idea that it is easier to have an abortion than to make an adoption plan for a child. When I ask what makes adoption seem so hard, the response is usually, "I would not want my child to be walking around out there, with me not knowing what is happening to him/her, or that the kid would be mad at me for giving him/her away."

When I ask them how they can have these kind of "concerned, parental feelings" for the child if they carried to term, yet can choose to have an abortion (read: exercise choice, kill, destroy, terminate, eliminate or whatever word you want to use here)? They usually respond, "Well, it's just a blob of tissue and I can't see it if I abort it, so I am not attached to it."

I have been trying to respond like this:

So, you are telling me that if you don't see the child there is no loss but if you carry to term there is a loss? Tell me how can you have such a different response to the same "blob of tissue"? If it is, as YOU say, a "blob of tissue" and "not visible", at what point would you begin to experience "concerned, parental feelings" for said "blob of invisible tissue " if you carried to term? Am I understanding you to say that you have conflicted feelings about said "blob of invisible tissue" or that you have parental concerns for your child? Please help me understand how you are rationalizing these conflicting feelings.

There is usually more to the conversation and hopefully the person will stop and consider that all of her responses are focused on self-preservation not on the well-being of the child. Pray with me that these encounters will slow the individuals down and cause them to think about how their thinking is, as my friend Karen once said, "stinkin" , and needs to be realigned with truth!

Romans 12:2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.

Abortion -- not JUST a woman's issue -- Fathers Suffer Too!

Here is one man's story of how abortion affected his life (used with permission) and how he found redemption in Christ:

A Father’s Post-Abortion Testimony

by Larry G.

As I grew up Catholic, I began to find that the Church did not teach the Bible, but the sacraments. As a teenager, I wandered from the faith I learned there. Also, I found myself very burdened by criticism from family and friends; I never felt like I was good enough and felt depressed a lot. I started experiencing the sandy foundation of compromise. I found happiness in working. For once, I received something for my efforts. On one occasion I made an ignorant plea for salvation, for I was in despair but not aware of what I was actually asking for, though. I do not count this as my salvation story; I only point out that I came from a broken world of compromise, where I didn’t know how to seek my own salvation.

In college, I felt empty and sought to find things that would fill it. It ended up leading me to repeated attempts at relationships (sex) and drinking alcohol, and all I found was a greater degree of rejection and one major bad decision (read below).

After college, I determined to find a church and get serious about God. As I was mulling over going back to church (I was not going to go back to Catholicism), my roommate received a flyer for a non-denominational church. I went to that church, and it was through their teachings of truth that I came to know my Lord and Savior.

But that is the short story. Here are the details.

In the midst of college, I had one major relationship, and all the worldly things came with it. During that relationship, she became pregnant. I had compromised so many areas of my life, I had no backbone to influence her to not abort the baby. In January of 1991 we aborted the baby. Ultimately, that relationship ended just before I graduated college in June of 1992. At the time, I thought I needed a break from dating, yet I met another woman. She was everything I thought I was looking for, except she wasn’t for sex. I hadn’t learned my lesson. After a month or so of trying to win her to the idea of sex, she relented and said yes. I was starting to learn that I had some issues, like self-pity, that I couldn‘t reconcile. Because of my issues, and their effect on her, this woman decided to leave. She was moving to Tennessee to go to school.

After she left, I found a flyer for a church.

But we had become pregnant, though we didn‘t know it when she left. After she left I decided I needed a new start and to find a church I could join, and I went to the church that had sent the flyer. I was touched by the messages. But three weeks into her move, she flew back for what was supposedly family time. Before she went back, though, she came over to my place and took a pregnancy test. It came back positive.

Now I knew God was doing something in my heart because I knew not to compromise this child. There was no retreat, only resolve to make the right choice. I had a different problem here, though, because this woman was firmly for having the baby, BUT against having me around! Well, the Lord shut the door on her schooling, and she returned home. We had a very difficult time at first, and after one very difficult meeting with her, I started to pray.

I knew I had made a mess of things. I knew God was bigger than I had learned of as a child, and I knew I needed his help and love. One teaching that I had heard from this new church, I kept remembering. It was on Psalm 18:2, “The Lord is my rock, and my fortress, and my deliverer; my God, my strength, in whom I will trust: my buckler, and the horn of my salvation, and my high tower.” I wanted to believe I had a deliverer, and the idea of a tower for protection seemed like water to a thirsty man. So, I went home, cleared some things from the floor and prayed for salvation. I poured my heart out, not in feeling sorry for myself, but in humble acceptance that I was a sinner and that I needed a Savior. I had visions and a heart of praise for God that I had never known before. And I saw how God used everything I had gone through to lead me to Him.

I didn’t tell this woman for almost a week about my decision, because she was doubting me on everything, and I thought it not wise to share such wonderful news until her heart changed. See, she had accepted Christ a few years earlier, only to find herself compromising her own Christian beliefs shortly before she met me. After a few days passed, she saw a change in me and came out and asked. I told her, and she cried. She thought for sure I wasn’t going to change and that she was planning to make our relationship only about the baby, but now she was more confused than ever.

We had that baby, Joseph, who is now 14, and she did marry me. We have grown a lot in Christ, and I want to continue to make decisions based on God's word, wash my wife in the Word, and to teach and inspire my children of the Lord throughout my life.

…for only by his grace are we saved.

Larry G.

11 States Considering Requirement for Ultrasound Before Abortion

Seeing the child will dispell the lie that it is just "tissue". If it's just 'tissue" as the pro-abortionists want women to believe, what could be the problem with looking at it?

Read the article here.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Fla. doctor investigated in badly botched abortion

02/05/09 02:15 PM
by CHRISTINE ARMARIO
Associated Press Writer

Eighteen and pregnant, Sycloria Williams went to an abortion clinic outside Miami and paid $1,200 for Dr. Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique to terminate her 23-week pregnancy.

Three days later, she sat in a reclining chair, medicated to dilate her cervix and otherwise get her ready for the procedure.

Only Renelique didn't arrive in time. According to Williams and the Florida Department of Health, she went into labor and delivered a live baby girl.

Read the rest of the story, showing how pro-abortionists view the pre-born, here.